174
Pace
158
Shooting
104
Passing
158
Dribbling
1x Shooting
70
Defending
129
Physical
Weak Foot
Skill Moves
Stamina
Skill Points used
1x Counter
3x Dexterity
This Review is brought to you by
7.6
优点
Watkins is a very quick and mobile striker, with great acceleration and sprint speed that allow him to make sharp runs behind the defence.
His off-the-ball movement is highly intelligent, as he constantly looks to find space and stretch the backline with well-timed attacking runs.
His finishing inside the box is clinical, especially from close range, making him a reliable scorer when given clear opportunities.
He has good positioning, often finding himself in the right place at the right time to convert chances.
His pressing ability and high work rate make him effective in applying pressure on defenders, forcing mistakes and helping his team regain possession.
He also has decent link-up play, using his short passing to combine well with attacking midfielders and wingers in quick moves.
缺点
He has a 4-star weak foot, but a 5-star weak foot would have made him much more unpredictable and complete in front of goal.
His 3-star skill moves limit his creativity and ability to beat defenders in one-on-one situations compared to more skillful strikers.
His physicality, while decent, is not elite, meaning he can sometimes struggle against strong centre-backs in tight duels.
替代方案
最终裁决
Ollie Watkins is a pacey and intelligent striker who excels at making runs, stretching defences, and scoring consistently inside the box. His high work rate and pressing ability add extra value, making him useful in both attack and defensive transitions. While his 3-star skill moves and average physicality prevent him from being fully dominant, his movement, finishing, and speed make him a very effective forward for players who like a fast striker constantly looking to exploit space.
Rating |
7.6
Follow us
It is a biased review in the cons it is mentioned has he lacks in pace and dribbling but compared to rodri (107) he has better pace and dribbling than rodri then how come it is stated that rodri is the no:1 cdm in your reviews
I have checked card in that no cons are mentioned why?
In terms of of shooting, passing,and weak foot rodri is better and in terms of physical, pace, dribbling, skill moves he is the better card
But you have given rodri a solid 10 rating and only 9.2 for him...